Health Economics & Outcome Research: Open Access

Clinical Outcomes for Diabetic Patients and Doctors' Empathy

Sinan Levy^{* *}Correspondence: Sinan Levy, Editorial office, Health Economics and Outcome Research, Brussels, Belgium, Belgium, Email:

Author info »

Introduction

A meaningful doctor-patient relationship is built on the foundation of empathic involvement in patient care. There is a focus on empathy in medicine and its beneficial implications on clinical outcomes, but there is a dearth of empirical data to back up the association between measures of physician empathy and concrete patient outcomes. However, research has looked at how the doctor-patient connection affects arbitrary metrics of patient outcomes. Others claim that proxy measures of empathy in patient care, such as verbal interaction, recognizing nonverbal signs, and spending time with the patient, might boost patient satisfaction and compliance and decrease the incidence of malpractice lawsuits. The efficiency of psychotherapy, patients' sense of importance, diagnostic accuracy, and prognostic accuracy have all been predicted by various indicators of empathetic connections.

With a yearly cost of over 130 billion dollars, diabetes affects 21 million Americans. There are still many opportunities for improvement in diabetes treatment, despite recent gains. Particularly for individuals with serious chronic illnesses like diabetes, the Institute of Medicine has recommended "patient-centered" methods of therapy. How primary care doctors may provide patient-centered care in a way that improves clinical outcomes is a crucial subject. We examined two strategies —"communicative support" and "practical support"—in this article to achieve this goal.

By offering options, taking into account patient preferences, knowing their needs, listening to them, and encouraging them to ask questions, doctors may empower their patients. A patient-centered consultation style and successful communication between the doctor and patient are key components of a strategy that acknowledges the patient's ability to recognize and learn to address their difficulties. A lot of family doctors have received training in using these methods to treat patients in the previous ten years. However, there is conflicting research on whether doctor-patient communication that encourages patient autonomy and self-management may, by itself, enhance clinical results. According to studies, a crucial component of medical empathy is a comprehension of the patient's point of view. This understanding boosts patients' feelings of empowerment and social support networks, as well as their perceptions of being treated. In a factor analytic analysis, interpersonal warmth and respect between doctors and patients, which are qualities associated with physician empathy, accounted for 52% of the variance in assessments of patient satisfaction with medical treatment. According to a study involving diabetes patients, effective consultations and patient satisfaction are predicted by dietitians' empathetic participation.

In their assessments of the quality of care, patients place a high priority on empathy as a fundamental element of all therapeutic partnerships. Based on Theodor Lipps's philosophical aesthetics idea of "empathy" in English literature one hundred years ago. In his book On Becoming a Person: A Therapist's View of Psychotherapy from 1961, Carl Rogers discusses empathy in a way that is significant historically. Since then, other authors have discussed the role of empathy in patient-physician communication as well as in the context of psychotherapy. After identifying the Mirror Neuron System (MNS) as perhaps relating to people's ability to be empathetic in recent decades, neuroscientific research has made tremendous progress in determining the neurological foundation for empathy.

Based on Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) studies, researchers have now provided additional insights. They have shown that the MNS is made up of neurons in the somatosensory regions, limbic and paralimbic structures, as well as mirror neurons in the ventral premotor cortex and the parietal area of the brain. To link these areas, the insula is essential. According to nine fMRI studies, those who do better on a questionnaire evaluating their propensity to put themselves in another person's shoes listen to other people's concerns with a greater degree of MNS activation. These findings bring the "soft" idea of empathy into "hard" science, opening up a tough new area of study with potentially significant therapeutic ramifications. It is vital to specify what authors mean when they use the term "empathy" to evaluate the efficacy of empathy. There are a few key components that can be distinguished, even though many writers struggle to provide a precise definition. In general, writers define empathy as a doctor's capacity to comprehend a patient's circumstances, point of view, and feelings, convey that knowledge to the patient and confirm its truth, and act on that understanding in a beneficial therapeutic way. It contains behavioral, cognitive, and emotional components.

The release of a written care plan that was decided upon with the patient, the setting of treatment objectives, and the provision of proactive follow-up to monitor disease control and treatment compliance are some examples of tangible actions that can be taken by health care teams to support patients in self-managing their health. This perspective is a complementary one that claims that improving clinical outcomes depends on these kinds of practical support. The Chronic Care Model places at least equal focus on communication and practical assistance when recommending "productive contact" between an "activated patient" and a "proactive clinic team" to improve clinical outcomes for patients with diabetes and other chronic illnesses.