Medical Reports & Case Studies

The Future and the Current State of Obesity Prevention

Rebeca Stones^{* *}Correspondence: Rebeca Stones, Editorial Office, Medical Reports and Case Studies, Morocco, Email:

Author info »

Opinion

The map displaying the prevalence of adult obesity in 2013 was just released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In comparison to 2010, the map clearly demonstrates a significant rise in the number of states with adult obesity prevalence rates at or over 30%. In particular, obesity prevalence rates in 12 states were at or over 30% in 2010 while in 20 states, the same percentage was present three years later. Regardless of race or ethnicity, gender, age, or socioeconomic class, obesity still has an impact on people. Successful preventative activities can contribute to reduced disease burden and lower health care costs. The effectiveness of obesity prevention initiatives aimed at altering food and exercise habits has not been sufficiently supported by data. On demonstration programmes, community transformation grants, communities putting prevention to work programmes, state programmes, and even interventions designed for employers, schools, healthcare providers, and the general community level targeted at particular populations, we have excessively spent money. We have not gotten much in return for our financial investment. The results of reviewing obesity prevention programmes have generated a lot of discussion regarding the kinds of initiatives that might or might not be successful. In an effort to combat obesity, the U.S. has recently started looking into the viability and possible results of policy- and environmentbased interventions. We have also worked to develop environmental programmes, such as bettering transportation systems and eliminating food swamps and deserts, to improve health determinants. Taxing sugarsweetened beverages and establishing regulations for school vending machines and meal programmes are further measures. These kinds of environmental and policy-related initiatives are thought to offer the highest chance of bringing about long-lasting change, albeit the results are still uncertain.

We frequently worry about the intervention's content in public health, where many of these attempts start. We are only now starting to examine the role that infrastructural and environmental factors play in efforts to prevent obesity in order to see how these features impact the intervention itself as we continue our search for efficient ways to do so. The Institute of Medicine advises employing a systems approach that incorporates structural issues along with cost, quality, and sustainability on a broader scale, with suggested adjustments to structural variables being the most frequently advised to reduce obesity. Donabedian-based conceptual frameworks illustrate the connections between various infrastructure components, such as the scope and limits of the jurisdiction, the legal standing of the top agency, the nature of the governance structure, and the provision of care and intervention.

The IOM-recommended strategy is used in recent studies, or at the very least, structural elements are examined as they pertain to local obesity prevention. For instance, Erwin et al. conducted a retrospective study to assess the relationship between resource levels and changes in health outcomes. Zhang et al.'s investigation of the connection between BMI status and the execution of population-based obesity prevention initiatives. Pomeranz et al. examined the local health departments' ability to make rules in relation to combating obesity. The role of regional health agencies in providing services for preventing obesity was investigated by Stamatakis et al. From 2005 to 2008, the local health departments' engagement in providing services for obesity prevention was examined by Luo et al. These research projects reflect a modest but expanding field of study. Many efforts are being made in Texas to better understand obesity in the entire state as well as in other geographic areas. We will compile a state directory of obesity researchers using a comprehensive analysis of the obesity research conducted by Texas university and government researchers with Texasbased samples. Once a profile of obesity in the state has been created, top obesity experts will get together with the Texas Health Institute, a significant health non-profit organisation, to fill in any gaps in the literature and conduct more study. In addition to clinical and pharmaceutical organisations that are actively researching endocrine disruptors, metabolic problems, and other physiological functions, there is an excessive amount of work being done in the field of obesity prevention. In order to achieve progress in resolving issues that affect so many people and are linked to life-altering disease and mortality, let's work together as individuals, in our communities, jurisdictions, states, and provinces to properly comprehend obesity in our geography. Something has to give eventually.