Author(s) is relied upon to be responsible for the displayed information and data in their manuscript alongside assuming the liability of the importance. They are expected to introduce original result of their research, and a significant reference ought to be considered while representing the data and setting down the discussion. Authors must submit data which is conceivable and reproducible. Supporting data, for example, figures and tables given by the authors should be readable and must be reproducible actually.
An author ought not to repeat any past research data from themselves or any other individual while presenting a unique original copy for an essential publication in any of the journal. The detailed scope of work should be founded on legitimate reference from different productions influencing the author’s manuscript. Prior to presenting any article, writers should check the journal’s scope and if there is any query they should contact the Editorial office.
It should be ensured that all authors are represented accurately and the submission must be exclusive and not under consideration elsewhere. Accurate contact details for a designated corresponding author should be mentioned, who shall be considered by the publisher and editor as completely accountable for the authorship of the paper and all communications concerning the ethical status and originality of the paper. This incorporates any inquiries or examinations that may emerge, pre-or post-production.
Authors should strictly adhere to the authorship criteria. Each and every listed author in the manuscript must have made a significant contribution to the research presented in the manuscript and approved all its claims. Any individual to be considered as a writer of a original research article must have contributed in any of the accompanying ways: designing of the study, executing the study or conducting the experiments, have taken part in analysing the data, supported in documenting the article and drawing the conclusion, spearheaded the project as a principal investigator. It is obligatory to incorporate everybody who made a notable contribution towards the completion of the research work.
Any person to be considered as an author of an original research article must have contributed in any of the following ways: designed the study, executed the study or conducted the experiments, have taken part in analysing the data, supported in documenting the article and drawing the conclusion, spearheaded the project as a principal investigator. It is mandatory to include everyone who made a significant contribution towards the completion of the research work.
Authors should openly disclose the source of all data and third party information, including formerly unpublished work by the authors themselves. Anything that could compromise the originality of the submission should be expressly avoided and/or discussed with the editorial office in the first instance. Identify any third party information that they that they plan to incorporate into their article, and acquire composed consent for re-use in each case from the important copyright holders. Such permissions should be submitted once the manuscript is accepted, or requires small changes to be accepted.
Any financial or individual intrigue that administers the discoveries or research in the manuscript along with the details of financial support and its sources should be revealed. Through the submission of an article the particular writers acknowledge that the article is neither under consideration nor published in any other journal.
Authors should openly disclose any conflict of interest and are expected to officially agree publication terms which define the author and the publisher’s rights for the work. They should correspond and comply with the editor and publisher in any requests for source information, verification of authorship or innovation in a timely manner, giving sensible clarification to errors or failures to disclose vital information. Authors are expected to co-operate fully with the publication of errata and with the retraction of articles found to be unethical, misleading or damaging.